The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) represents a major regulatory turning point for Europe, aimed at aligning business practices with the continent's ambitious climate goals. By taxing imports based on their carbon footprint, the MACF is profoundly changing market dynamics and pushing companies to comprehensively reassess their supply chains.

This article explores the challenges and successes encountered by companies in this new regulatory framework, by addressing various themes such as access to information, carbon control, data collection, adaptation to changes in the European portal, and the financial impact of these new obligations. We dive into the experiences of businesses to understand how they navigate this complex landscape and what strategies they use to take advantage of these changes.

Access to Information

Confusing communication around the MACF and the CSRD directive

European importers have faced significant challenges in accessing clear information on the MACF, exacerbated by the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) on sustainability that has dominated the media space. This situation has created considerable confusion as MACF has often been relegated to the background, leaving businesses without the resources to prepare effectively. This confusing communication has not only obscured the crucial details of the MACF but has also put businesses in a difficult position to navigate complex regulatory requirements, making compliance more challenging and strategic implementation uncertain.

‍

Strategies for success

Despite the information challenges, some companies have demonstrated effective strategies to adapt to the requirements of the MACF:

· Specialized training : Investment in training programs to educate staff on the specificities of MACF, ensuring a better understanding and management of regulatory requirements.

· External consultation : Collaboration with regulatory experts and consultants to navigate the most complex aspects of MACF.

· Active participation in the forums: Involvement in sectoral working groups and forums where practices, challenges and solutions are shared between companies, enriching the collective knowledge base.

· Establishment of internal systems: Development of internal systems for data management and reporting in accordance with MACF, often with the help of advanced technological solutions.

These approaches have allowed businesses not only to overcome the obstacles associated with MACF regulations, but also to transform these challenges into competitive advantages, thus improving their market positioning.

‍

Mastery of the carbon subject

The complexity of the carbon issue represents a major obstacle for companies that must comply with the MACF. This complexity extends from understanding the principles of calculating emissions to managing environmental data effectively, often requiring specialized skills that are not inherent in all organizations.

‍

Internal skills challenges:

· Technical understanding: The need to understand direct and indirect emissions in detail and their regulatory implications.

· Analytical capabilities: Businesses need to be able to analyze and interpret complex environmental data to ensure that it meets MACF standards.

Development of specialized skills:

· Trainings and certifications : Some companies have invested in specialized training for their staff, going so far as to obtain certifications in carbon management to strengthen their internal expertise.

· Targeted recruitment : Others have chosen to recruit dedicated environmental experts to strengthen their teams, guaranteeing competent management of MACF requirements.

Success cases:

· Technological integration: A manufacturing company successfully integrated emissions tracking software, improving data accuracy and regulatory compliance.

· Strategic collaborations: Another has formed partnerships with consultants and academic institutions to stay at the forefront of technology and sustainability practices.

In short, mastering the subject of carbon is imperative to successfully navigate the regulatory waters of the MACF. Businesses that recognized and addressed these challenges by developing internal skills or partnering with specialists were more successful in turning these challenges into competitive advantages. These efforts illustrate the importance of a proactive and well-informed approach to meeting complex environmental regulatory requirements.

Data collection

The collection of real production data, essential for compliance with the MACF, represents a particularly acute challenge for European importers dealing with suppliers outside the EU. The variability in the technical and organizational capacities of suppliers complicates the acquisition of accurate and verifiable emissions data.

‍

Difficulties encountered:

· Heterogeneity of practices: Suppliers outside the EU do not always have the systems needed to measure and report emissions reliably, creating disparities in the quality of the data received.

· Regulatory and cultural barriers: Differences in environmental regulations and business practices that influence the availability and reliability of environmental data.

‍

Strategies for success:

· Advanced technologies : Some companies have implemented advanced technologies to improve data collection and analysis, such as integrated ERP systems that facilitate real-time monitoring of emissions.

· Collaborations and partnerships: Others have formed strategic partnerships with their suppliers or have invested in training and developing supplier skills to ensure compliance and data accuracy.

· Certifications and audits: The use of third-party certifications and the implementation of regular audits have also helped some businesses ensure the integrity of the data collected.

These initiatives show that despite the obstacles, it is possible to set up effective data collection systems for the MACF. Businesses that take a proactive and collaborative approach with their suppliers manage not only to overcome the challenges of data collection but also to strengthen their supply chains against future risks.

‍

Adaptation to the European portal

Adapting to the European portal for the MACF poses significant challenges due to frequent updates and changes in methodological requirements. This portal, designed to centralize the filing and management of data relating to carbon emissions from imports, evolves regularly to incorporate new regulations and functionalities, which can confuse users used to previous versions.

‍

Challenges of the European portal:

· Increased complexity : The new functionalities and fields to be filled in increase the complexity of the reporting process.

· Need for continuing education : Users need to train continuously to stay up to date with portal changes.

‍

Coping strategies:

· IT systems update: Businesses are investing in improving their IT systems to facilitate the integration and management of new portal functionalities.

· Regular training sessions: Training sessions are organized for compliance teams to ensure a thorough understanding of portal updates.

· Specialized technical support: Many rely on specialized technical support, sometimes provided by external consultants, to navigate the portal effectively.

These adaptations are crucial so that companies can not only comply with the regulatory requirements of the MACF but also use the European portal as a strategic tool for environmental management. Companies that succeed in mastering these adaptations can thus minimize the risks of non-compliance and optimize their reporting processes.

‍

Financial impact of the CBAM

The introduction of the MACF raises major concerns about its financial impact on European businesses, particularly with regard to competitiveness in a global market. The obligation to buy MACF certificates from 2026 is a major source of financial uncertainty, as additional costs could significantly affect margins and prices of imported products.

‍

Financial impact analysis:

· Increased costs: Businesses should be prepared for additional expenses associated with the mandatory purchase of certificates that reflect the CO2 emissions of their imports.

· Price pressure: These costs could be passed on to consumers, affecting the competitiveness of products on the European market.

‍

Case study:

· Strategic foresight: A European manufacturing company started integrating these costs into its pricing strategy long before the MACF came into force. By working closely with its suppliers, the company has worked to reduce its emissions upstream, thus reducing the number of certificates required.

· Innovation and adaptation: Another has invested in emissions-reducing technologies for its imported products, turning the MACF challenge into an opportunity to promote sustainable innovations.

These approaches illustrate how, despite financial uncertainty, proactive businesses can use MACF as a lever to strengthen their competitiveness while promoting sustainability.

‍

Conclusion

The challenges raised by the MACF, from regulatory complexity to financial uncertainty, are significant. This article explored these challenges through concrete testimonies from businesses in the field, illustrating both the problems and the successful strategies for dealing with them. These examples show that proactive preparation and continuous adaptation are critical to turning these challenges into opportunities.

Keewe, your partner for CBAM compliance

In this complex context, Keewe is positioned as a crucial ally for businesses. By offering specialized support, Keewe helps its clients overcome MACF obstacles, effectively comply with regulations, and optimize their operations. With Keewe, ensure the compliance of your business while adapting to regulatory changes with agility.